animal testing should be banned debate points

The very first reason why animal testing should be banned is elementary: it is cruel and unnecessary. One of the easiest and most effective ways to say no to animal testing is to vote is with your money. Also, anyone who handles the animals should be properly trained. Investigate what benefits laboratories, universities, and experimenters gain by using animals in experiments, and think critically about their motivations. Its worth remembering that theres no such thing as the perfect vegan. This is a list of drugs and supplements that are being investigated as a potential treatment for Huntingtons disease. Subscribe for new episodes. This reflects a belief in a hierarchy of moral standing with more complex animals at the top and microorganisms and plants at the bottom. Non-animal testing methods are humane for the sake of both humans and animals. Accessibility StatementFor more information contact us [email protected] check out our status page at https://status.libretexts.org. Text STOP to end, HELP for more info. Current subscribers: You will continue to receive e-mail unless you explicitly opt out by clicking, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. What is food addiction describe it in one paragraph. Fortunately, its been illegal to test cosmetic products, such as make-up, perfumes and moisturisers, on animals in the UK and all EU countries since 1998. Roughly speaking, this is a group of individuals who all share certain traits in common. Thus, animals should be treated with the same respect as humans. This section of the website gives an introduction to the brain, focusing on the changes caused by HD. Yet, such experiments belittle the complexity of human conditions which are affected by wide-ranging variables such as genetics, socio-economic factors, deeply-rooted psychological issues and different personal experiences. Here are our top tips for avoiding products that have been tested on animals: *Please note that these brands were against animal testing at the time of writing. They also do not necessarily reflect the views of the HOPES team. 832.813.6500, document.write(new Date().getFullYear()); Lone Star College, LSC-North Harris English Faculty Resources, LSC-North Harris English Faculty and Staff, Jeffrey and Lonette Stayton Awards for Writing, Campus Health, Safety, and Risk-Management Awareness (CHSRMA), Drug and Alcohol Abuse Prevention Program (DAAPP), State Auditor's Office Fraud, Waste or Abuse Hotline, Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB). Next, the pain and suffering that experimental animals are subject to is not worth any possible benefits to humans. Many people believe that researchers would make more informed discoveries if the resources directed towards animal experimentation were invested into developing kinder, more compassionate methods. Empty Cages: Animals Rights and Vivisection.. We operate as a not-for-profit public service organization, and our funding is entirely from private sources. Poisoning, shocking, burning, and killing animals is all in a days work for vivisectors. In my opinion, animal testing should not be banned because using animals for experiments is cheaper and there is no way to simulate human pregnancy. Best Skincare Gifts for Making Futures Bright - Biossance. Since those reasons apply to many animals experimented upon, animal testing is also wrong. Animal Testing Should Be Not only are time, money and animals lives being wasted (with a huge amount of suffering), but effective treatments are being mistakenly discarded and harmful treatments are getting through. Broadly speaking, and particularly in popular discourse, the term "animal rights"
Should animal testing be banned? This synthetic material turns opaque when a product damages it, closely resembling the way that a real eye reacts to harmful substances. 2. Accordingly, animal experimentation should not be banned. WebSome people argue that all animal experimentation should end because it is wrong to treat animals merely as tools for furthering knowledge. Accordingly, potential animal rights violations are outweighed by the greater human benefits of animal research. Yet in an article entitled "Is Your Experiment Really Necessary?" Both infants and the mentally handicapped frequently lack complex cognitive capacities, full autonomy, or even both of these traits. Despite many decades of studying cancer, Alzheimers disease, Parkinsons disease, diabetes, stroke and AIDS in animals, none of these conditions have reliable and fully effective cures and some dont even have effective treatments. Animal testing should be prohibited. Animals feel pain in many of the same ways that humans do; in fact, their reactions to pain are virtually identical (both humans and animals scream, for example). For example, in most human moral communities all individuals have the right to make independent decisions and live autonomous lives and with that right comes the responsibility to respect others independence. Do they lack fundamental human rights and should we use them for experimentation? Once animals have been excluded from the moral community, humans have only a limited obligation towards them; on this argument, we certainly would not need to grant animals all normal human rights. Current subscribers: You will continue to receive e-mail unless you explicitly opt out by clicking, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. They languish in pain, suffer from extreme frustration, ache with loneliness, and long to be free. By submitting this form, you are agreeing to our collection, storage, use, and disclosure of your personal info in accordance with our privacy policy as well as to receiving e-mails from us. Others respond that animals themselves benefit from animal research. Its unethical. The idea is that mammals, such as apes, horses and rats, will have similar reactions to humans. For many people, the big question is: why do industries rely on animal experimentation? First, and most obviously, drugs and medical procedures treat diseases, injuries, and other health problems. The Research Basics section describes how researchers study HD; the Research Updates section talks about some of the discoveries that have been made, and future areas that scientists might study in the future. In summary, defenders of animal experimentation argue that humans have higher moral status than animals and fundamental rights that animals lack. a marketing ban prohibition to market finished cosmetic products and ingredients in the Thus, animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, the result is unreliable and expensive. People with HD can engage in many activities such as physical therapy and exercise that help them deal with symptoms. Animal testing is a controversial practice, and many people have strong feelings about it. The purpose of this section of our website is to approach all depictions of HD in the media with a critical lens media outlets often dramatize their depictions of medical conditions in an attempt to draw in viewers and readers. Their decisions are made for them because they cannot vocalize their own preferences and choices. Animals are also regularly tested by the military. Its wrong and In Favor :- Many human lives can be saved by carrying out experiments on animals beforehand. WebBanning the use of such drugs, however, would greatly reduce the efficiency of the industry, driving up the cost of meat. My point is still valid even if I abandon my consciousness argument. subtitle: Alternatives to animal tests are often cheaper, quicker and more effective. And they are killed at the end of the experiments to study the treatments effects. 1047 Words5 Pages. in Orlans 26). Msg/data rates may apply. These marketing bans mean that companies all around the world will have to abandon animal testing for cosmetics they want to sell in these huge markets. Animal Testing Should Be Not everyone has the time to rally against animal testing on the streets, but you can decide to withdraw support from the businesses and brands that are complicit in the practice (again, as much as is possible or practical). In addition to the medications that we all get at a pharmacy, another large influence on human health can also be found in the marketplace at the grocery store! Its challenging to consider the potential benefits of testing on animals if you dont believe that human and non-human lives should be valued any differently. Its fair to assume that most vegans do or have taken some form of medicine, and it was recently found that almost 90% of vegans in the UK have had at least one Covid-19 vaccination. This involves detailed examination of the procedures and the number and type of animals used. So while no one can choose their own genes, people at risk for HD can choose a healthy lifestyle. Our research and points of view will help you answer the question: why should animal testing be banned? These individuals feel that animals have no rights because they lack the capacity to understand or to knowingly exercise these rights. Our goal is to survey the rapidly growing scientific literature on HD and to present this information in a web source. Making use of alternatives that are available for animal experimentation is therefore, a better choice. Yet, such experiments belittle the complexity of human conditions which are affected by wide-ranging variables such as genetics, socio-economic factors, deeply-rooted psychological issues and different personal experiences. This student debate kit lists a variety of resources that can be shared with students to support the argument that animals shouldnt be used in experiments. Animals have And how exactly might anyone know that humans benefit more than animals are harmed? Do your students need to conduct an interview as part of their research? Terms for automated texts/calls from PETA: http://peta.vg/txt. The UK government has admitted to testing on animals to develop protective pharmaceuticals, such as Nerve Agent Pretreatment Sets (NAPS), but this is just one example of how animals are used in the armed forces. One review of 101 high impact discoveries based on basic animal experiments found that only 5% resulted in approved treatments within 20 years. The support for animal testing is based largely on anecdote and is not backed up, we believe, by the scientific evidence that is out there. Of course, these laws are still far from ideal but they are much kinder than those of many other countries. While a combination of chemical and human cell tests has been shown to accurately predict human skin reactions 90% of the time, skin irritation tests on rabbits only predict human reactions 60% of the time. Its wrong and should be banned. The voting age should be reduced to 16 years old. 4. Why? Web 145 debate topics and ideas simple debate topics death penalty and its abolishment. Some of them are:
Is marriage outdated? Another way to reduce animal use is to ensure that studies are conducted according to the highest standards and that all information collected will be useable. English, 28.10.2019 18:29, joyce5512. When animals are used for product toxicity testing or laboratory research, they are subjected to painful and frequently deadly experiments. Animals and Ethics 101 - Thinking Critically About Animal Rights (Nobis), { "8.01:_Readings" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.02:_Criticisms_or_Complaints_about_(Some)_Activists_Have_No_Implications_for_the_Morality_of_Animal_Use" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.03:_Ends_and_Means" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.04:_Animal_Advocates_Promoting_Animal_Use" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.05:_Illegal_Actions" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.06:_Violent_Actions" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.07:_Discussion_Questions" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.08:_Recommended_Further_Reading-" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.09:_Abortion_and_Animal_Rights-_Does_Either_Topic_Lead_to_the_Other" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "8.10:_Animal_Testing_Should_Be_Banned" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, { "00:_Front_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "01:_Introduction_to_Ethics_Logic_and_Ethics_and_Animals" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "02:_What_Are_(Some)_Animals_Like_Animal_Minds_and_Harms_to_Animals" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "03:_In_Defense_of_Animals-_Some_Moral_Arguments" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "04:_Objections_to_Defenses_of_Animals_and_Defending_Animal_Use" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "05:_Wearing_and_Eating_Animals" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "06:_Experimenting_on_Animals_Animals_in_Education" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "07:_Pets___Companion_Animals_Zoos_Hunting_Racing_and_other_Uses_of_Animals" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "08:_Activism_for_Animals" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "zz:_Back_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, [ "article:topic", "license:ccbysa", "showtoc:no", "authorname:nnobis", "licenseversion:40", "source@https://animalethics101.blogspot.com/p/nathan-nobis.html" ], https://human.libretexts.org/@app/auth/3/login?returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fhuman.libretexts.org%2FBookshelves%2FPhilosophy%2FAnimals_and_Ethics_101_-_Thinking_Critically_About_Animal_Rights_(Nobis)%2F08%253A_Activism_for_Animals%2F8.10%253A_Animal_Testing_Should_Be_Banned, \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}}}\) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\). Check out the HOPES Brain Tutorial for an illustrated tour of the brain; look at our Neurobiology section for an in-depth look at the cells that make up the brain; go to the Other Neurodegenerative Conditions section to learn about diseases that share some similarities to HD. But the value we place on the quality of their lives is determined by their perceived value to humans" (34). Theshow more content. The use of animals in research is never undertaken lightly. Regan further says, for example, that "animal [experimentation] is morally wrong no matter how much humans may benefit because the animal's basic right has been infringed. WebConducting research on animals has led to significant breakthroughs in the worlds of science and medicine, and it must not be banned since its benefits outweigh its costs. Also, animals have feelings, thoughts, goals, needs, and desires that are similar to human functions and capacities, and these similarities should be respected, not exploited, because of the selfishness of humans. Learn more about vivisection on The PETA Podcast: Listen to more episodes on iTunes, Stitcher, and Spotify! Web check the price for your assignment. Animals living with the induced conditions is unpleasant also. People of all genders should be required to register for the draft. Healthcare should be available to everybody. WebDebate about whether or not tests on animals should be banned. Why? The problem with this reasoning is that the animals' safety, well-being, and quality of life is generally not a consideration. "Time to Reform Toxic Tests." Another alternative to this test is a product called Eyetex. Furthermore, the Draize test has become practically obsolete because of the development of a synthetic cellular tissue that closely resembles human skin. A recent study found that out of 93 dangerous drug side effects, only 19% could have been predicted by animal tests. .This inherent value is not respected when animals are reduced to being mere tools in a scientific experiment" (qtd. By submitting this form, you are agreeing to our collection, storage, use, and disclosure of your personal info in accordance with our privacy policy as well as to receiving e-mails from us. in Orlans 26). Chocolate, grapes, raisins, avocados and macadamia nuts are harmless in humans but toxic to dogs. Therefore, animal experimentation should be stopped because it violates the rights of animals. WebWhile scientists claim that animal testing and research are crucial for finding new cures and therapies, this essay demonstrates that using animals for research purposes and cruel experiments should be forbidden because they have environmental hazards, are unethical, and violate animals rights. On closer scrutiny, there exists a wide range of positions on the debate over the ethics of animal testing. People have different feelings for animals; many look upon animals as companions while others view animals as a means for advancing medical techniques or furthering experimental research. Some claim there are no alternatives to animal testing, that it is necessary. But there are alternatives (mentioned above) and its not literally necessary that anyone do it: they can refrain. Its also important to remember that cruelty-free and vegan arent synonymous. There is great variability in age of onset and progression of disease, only about 40% of which can be explained by the number of CAG repeats and lifestyle choices might account for some of that variability. However, there is an ongoing debate about the ethics of animal experimentation. Animal testing for make-up and toiletries, How to Avoid Products that Have Been Tested on Animals, far short of being able to predict human responses, Glossier, bareMinerals, Fenty Beauty and Charlotte Tilbury, Where to Buy Vegan Condensed Milk, Recipes & More, The Best Vegan & Vegan-friendly Restaurants in Liverpool. Why? Understanding both sides of the debate about animal testing is crucial Its now easy to see why animal testing is wrong: it violates basic principles of ethical research: it is maleficent, or harmful to the research subjects; it is not beneficial to them; it is forced on them since they dont consent; and it is unjust in that animals are burdened with problems not their own. Some of them are:
Is marriage outdated? Why vegans may avoid them? In modern times, the question has shifted from whether animals have moral status to how much moral status they have and what rights come with that status. As mentioned in the HD in Hong Kong section, it has been proposed that the prevalence of. Without Consent, PETAs interactive timeline, features almost 200 stories of animals used in twisted experiments from the past century, including ones in which dogs were forced to inhale cigarette smoke for months, mice were cut up while still conscious, and cats were deafened, paralyzed, and drowned. Additionally, well designed studies and appropriate statistical analysis of data can minimize the number of animals required for statistically significant results. in Orlans 26). Animal Testing Shouldnt Be Banned. Fill out the form at the bottom of our Request a Speaker page and well be in touch about scheduling a virtual presentation to your class from Dr. Katherine Roe, the chief of the Science Advancement & Outreach division at PETA. 5. Research at least with animals who are conscious, and so are able to be harmed or made worse off is wrong for reasons that comparable human research would be wrong. Usually, this middle view accepts experimentation on some, but not all, animals and aims to avoid unnecessary use of animals in scientific research by pursuing alternatives to animal testing. Luckily weve got some of the strictest here in the UK. English, 28.10.2019 18:29, joyce5512. It is not surprising to find that treatments showing promise in animals rarely work in humans. Choose your team -- Reds or Greens on each single topic. Being of a particular race or gender does not give one any grounds for declaring outsiders to be of a lower moral status. Proponents of continued animal experimentation often also point out that progress can still be made to improve the conditions of laboratory animals and they fully support efforts to improve living conditions in laboratories, to use anesthesia appropriately, and to require trained personnel to handle animals. A universal basic income should be implemented in the United States. The DNA The reason for this wide variation in HD prevalence in different ethnic communities is unclear. However, animal experimentation in medical research and cosmetics testing cannot be justified on the basis that animals are lower on the evolutionary chart than humans since animals resemble humans in so many ways. Therefore, it is ethically wrong to use harmful and invasive research on such animals. "Zoos are prisons for animals, camouflaging their cruelty with conservation claims," Mimi Bekhechi, director of international programmes at PETA, explains. It will have the rabbit symbol on the back on the bottom. But animals suffer and die every day in laboratories with little or no protection from cruelty. With that in mind, the argument runs, it is best practice to act charitably and treat all humans as part of the moral community. Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, source@https://animalethics101.blogspot.com/p/nathan-nobis.html, status page at https://status.libretexts.org. Its archaic. For whatever reason, you are now asking the question: Why should animals have rights? READ MORE, Ingrid E. Newkirk, PETA President and co-author of Animalkind. Orlans, F. Barbara. UW-Madison Stops Cruel Experiments; Cats Saved, Alzheimers Researchers Admit That Experiments on Animals Are a Big Fat Failure. Animal testing should be banned because it is so expensive. Urge Texas A&M to Stop Funding Cruel Experiments on Dogs. Here are the top five reasons why it needs to stop: Its unethical to sentence 100 million thinking, feeling animalsto life in a laboratory cage and intentionally cause them pain, loneliness, and fear. The science relating to animal experiments can be extremely complicated and views often differ. subtitle: Millions of animals are used and killed in the name of progress every year. Animals do not willingly sacrifice themselves for the advancement of human welfare and new technology. Under this view, the ways in which experimentation might harm the animal are less morally significant than the potential human benefits from the research. Millions of mice, rats, rabbits, primates, cats, dogs, and other animals are locked inside barren cages in laboratories across the country to be used in experiments. a testing ban prohibition to test finished cosmetic products and cosmetic ingredients on animals. Urge Companies to End the Near-Drowning of Animals in Forced Swim Tests. Let TeachKind Help YouWith Our Virtual Lessons and Activities, Real-World STEM Lessons: Fighting COVID-19 Without Hurting Animals, Host a Student-Led Book Club Based on PETA Presidents Bestseller Animalkind. This test is extremely painful to the animals because death can take days or even weeks. The Moral Community., Frey, R.G. Therefore, there are ongoing debates on whether animal testing should go on or it should be banned. The harm that is committed against animals should not be minimized because they are not considered to be "human.". Many animals, especially the higher mammalian species, possess internal systems and organs that are identical to the structures and functions of human internal organs. The information we present is intended for educational purposes only and should not be construed as offering diagnoses or recommendations. But suppose someone wanted to rob a bank and needed a getaway car: there is no alternative to a car and so it is necessary for the robbery. Animal experiments are cruel, unreliable, and even dangerous. Text UGLY to 73822 to tell UGGs to choose vegan materials and stop supporting the mutilation and violent killing of sheep! One principle calls for the preferential research use of less complex organisms whenever possible. These resources will assist students in supporting their position using scientific, ethical, and philosophical arguments. According to data collected by F. Barbara Orlans for her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, sixty percent of all animals used in testing are used in biomedical research and product-safety testing (62). Animal testing should be banned because it is an unethical process. WebPoint to be noted: Animals never gave us permission to test on them. Its wasteful. WebThe answer of course is NO. The vegan community isnt the only one rallying against animal testing. Its unethical to sentence 100 million thinking, feeling animals to Aspirin is toxic to many animals and would not be on our pharmacy shelves if it had been tested according to current animal testing standards. The Draize test has been criticized for being unreliable and a needless waste of animal life. The first step in making that argument is to show that humans are more important than animals. But its unlikely that animal experimentation would help their child much: other methods are likely more fruitful. conducted an analysisof 27 key animal-based breakthroughs. We never considered the impact of these actions on the animals involved. Experimental animals are virtually tortured to death, and all of these tests are done in the interest of human welfare, without any thought to how the animals are treated. What appears on this websiterepresents Cruelty Free International expert opinion, based on a thorough assessment of the evidence. As a result, its difficult to argue that animal testing in industries such as beauty should remain in place whether you follow a vegan lifestyle or not. Animals do not naturally get many of the diseases that humans do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinsons disease or schizophrenia. However individuals perceive animals, the fact remains that animals are being exploited by research facilities and cosmetics companies all across the country and all around the world. There are a variety of reasons why the practice should be banned. Animals should not be used for research because it is cruel, has negative side effects, and is bad science. One reason that animal testing should be prohibited is that its cruel and harmful. However, in Asia, the prevalence of HD is approximately one tenth of the HD prevalence in Western population. Help Animals Via TextJoin PETA s First Responders! Huntington's Outreach Project for Education at Stanford (HOPES) is a student-run project at Stanford University with the goal of making information about Huntingtons Disease (HD) more accessible to audiences worldwide. According to the Home Office, 2.88 million procedures were carried out in 2020 for scientific purposes alone. It helps Are starburst vegan? To perform this test, the researchers hook the animals up to tubes that pump huge amounts of the test product into their stomachs until they die. Another study showed that over 1,000 potential stroke treatments have been successful in animal tests, but of the approximately 10% that progressed to human trials, none worked sufficiently well in humans. New Scientist 134 (1992): 32-34. Animals do not naturally get many of the diseases that humans do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinsons disease or schizophrenia. Vegan Outfitters: Your Go-to Shop for Vegan Outfits, Vegan Meat Alternatives: Free from Meat, Full of Flavour. This page titled 8.10: Animal Testing Should Be Banned is shared under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Nathan Nobis (Open Philosophy Press) via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform; a detailed edit history is available upon request.